My daughter’s school class talked about “black history” last week. They spoke about Martin Luther King and Rosa Parks. Now, whilst these people both have historically significant stories, is this not more American history?
I am puzzled why there appears to have been no mention of Africa and the common heritage of all African-descended peoples, why there was no mention of other signficant figures; there are plenty to choose from. Nelson Mandela, Malcolm X, Marcus Garvery, the list could go on, The aniversary of Halie Selassie’s famous “war” speech to the UN was on the fourth of this month.
Now I know, it’s only middle-school level and I can’t expect too much. However, the apartehied regime in South Africa, for example, was within my lifetime. Nelson Mandella was mentioned a lot in the news when I was young and the links between the regime in South Africa and the UK are arguably stronger than those between the UK and the USA. The same is true with Jamaica, being a former British colony. We also have a connection to India and hence to the life of Gandhi. Should black history not encompass more than just the USA; the majority of black peoples worldwide live outside of the USA.
I can’t help think that the school have paid lip-service to this part of the curriculm by providing a small snapshot of Black people in American culture. Perhaps if I lived in a more culturally-diverse area this would not be the case. I wonder if schools in more culturally diverse areas are more likely to provide a broader view of this subject. Now I know, all of this is probably not deliberate, the teachers probably have little knowledge of the subject matter themselves and even less time to research it. The lesson plan probably originated from a Google search which turned up american websites. However, should a broader view of this huge chunk of international history be more integrated into the school curriculm and by so doing understanding be cultivated, even in areas of lower cultural diversity?